Prediction of Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Naomi Broady Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs N. Broady

Anna-Lena Friedsam

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.89m

194

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$330.0K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Naomi Broady

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.89m

194

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$330.0K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Broady

They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Naomi Broady winning 0. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Naomi Broady was at the San Antonio Open - San Antonio, 15-03-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Friedsam	1
Broady	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) San Antonio Open - San Antonio(03-15-16)

Stats

Anna-Lena Friedsam

Naomi Broady

A. Friedsam vs N. Broady H2H Profile

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Broady
$1,078,782	Career Prize Money	$329,987
59.94% (398-266)	Career Total W/L	52.72% (378-339)
1	Hard	0
15	Titles	9
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-2)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Friedsam vs N. Broady Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 42.00% of points on their second serve, while Naomi Broady has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Friedsam, in recent form, has won 50.40% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naomi Broady has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Friedsam has saved 54.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naomi Broady has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 63.79% of matches played (W/L 37/21), with Naomi Broady winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 122/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/19). Naomi Broady has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 111/87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 38/56).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/14), where as Naomi Broady has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 1 times and Naomi Broady being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Naomi Broady winning 0.
The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Naomi Broady was at the San Antonio Open - San Antonio, 15-03-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:28.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.59 while Naomi Broady has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naomi Broady has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Friedsam has converted 38.10% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naomi Broady has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Naomi Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Friedsam vs N. Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Broady
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
7	Aces (Total)	3
0	Total Double Faults	4
0:57:28	Average Match Time	0:57:28
55% (21/38)	1st Serve %	38% (17/45)
90% (19/21)	1st Serve Win %	71% (12/17)
76% (13/17)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (12/28)
67% (4/6)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
47% (21/45)	Return Points Win %	16% (6/38)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F - 10-11-2025
Rubber 1 Jeline VandrommeJ. Vandromme	L	7-6(0) 2-6 6-3	Stats
Austin 125 - Austin - 03-11-2025
R1 Iva JovicI. Jovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Torneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025
QF Oksana SelekhmetevaO. Selekhmeteva	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
R2 Linda KlimovicovaL. Klimovicova	W	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
R1 Andrea Lazaro GarciaA. Lazaro	W	2-6 7-6(4) 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Broady Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Birmingham Classic - Birmingham - 14-06-2021
Q1 Kurumi NaraK. Nara	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
W15 Sharm El Sheikh - 22-02-2021
R2 Svenja OchsnerS. Ochsner	L	6-3 2-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Dasha PlekhanovaD. Plekhanova	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
W25 Potchefstroom - 15-02-2021
Q3 Alice RameA. Rame	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Heike Janse Van VuurenH. Janse	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

A. Friedsam vs N. Broady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Broady
59.94% (398/266)	YTD Win/Loss	52.72% (378/339)
57.98% (897/650)	Sets Win/Loss	52.93% (886/788)
53.48% (7684/6683)	Games Win/Loss	51.57% (8172/7674)
55.67% (108/86)	Hard Win/Loss	53.94% (178/152)
59.66% (139/94)	Clay Win/Loss	50.98% (26/25)
66.83% (135/67)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.20% (136/106)
45.71% (16/19)	Grass Win/Loss	40.43% (38/56)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.32
1583	Aces Total	2453
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
1702	Total Double Faults	1334
1:11:45	Average Match Time	1st Match
466.49	Average Opponent Rank	599.88
65% (22459/34590)	1st Serve %	58% (12987/22487)
65% (14646/22459)	1st Serve Win %	72% (9360/12987)
46% (5576/12129)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (4130/9500)
45% (1711/3768)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (879/2079)
43% (14589/34179)	Return Points Win %	39% (8507/21701)
36.84% (21/36)	Slam W/L	30.95% (13/29)
33.33% (10/20)	Masters W/L	38.89% (7/11)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
52.88% (101/90)	Main Tour W/L	42.20% (46/63)
67.85% (211/100)	Challenger W/L	54.37% (224/188)
76.81% (53/16)	Futures W/L	64.71% (88/48)
60% (389/650)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (373/709)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
52% (91/176)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (104/220)
54% (123/229)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (111/247)
85% (391/334)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (389/317)
14% (391/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (389/71)
23% (273/63)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (327/59)